#Openoffice versus microsoft office pdf
#Openoffice versus microsoft office code
#Openoffice versus microsoft office download

Until very recently there were no native ports of OO or Abi Word to OS X. The whole point of my switching OS X was to ditch MS. I really, really tried to limp along in OS X without Office. Very reluctantly, I choose MS Office as best. If you are not that desperate to get a good end result then anything that can do the job will be good enough for you so just go with OOo. It gives far more flexibility and control then any program can offer.

#Openoffice versus microsoft office code

Well, if you really want the best possible end result then you should learn to write code like HTML for online veiw for example. But perhaps I just think so because thats the programs that I had to spend time learning all the cool functions of in high school. Macromedia Dreamweaver is best for formatting text for online view. MS Powerpoint is best for preparing text for presentations with a projector.

MS Publisher (and not a word processor) is best for formatting text for print. And you can be sure that you will be able to open the file with any version of any text editor. Because simple text editors are easier then word processors while advanced text editors have more functions that are actually related to the actual writing. Just because it's passable for now, doesn't mean it's the best route.Ī text editor is best for writing text. The argument that MSO is better simply because it's formats are used the most is like saying that crooked HTML + ActiveX is better than W3C-compliant code because IE is the most popular browser. OOo2 attempts and does a good job of handling the blackbox formats of MSO 2003 and prior, yet MS refuses to support an open file format.the formation of which MS participated in. ppt will change especially since even MSO 2007 defaults to new file formats. Now of course the standard response is 'you'll never have to!' - That may be true for now, but the 'universal' nature of. 's support is bad for MSO files? Try opening OpenDocument files in MSO ) I haven't used StarOffice so I can't comment on it.Īs someone else mentioned the only real significant benefit of MSO is that so many people use it and therefore they use its file formats.

#Openoffice versus microsoft office pdf

Even if you drop Base, Draw & Math.For me, built-in Export to PDF & Flash seal the deal. MSO 2003 Student & Teacher Edition isn't much of a contest for me. Since I'm not a hardcore Excel user I'd say that 2 is better than MSO 2003. However, if you plan on upgrading to MSO 2007, some level of retraining is unavoidable (although I'm surprised MS hasn't announced some sort of 'legacy UI mode') Especially if you use high-level features. If you've grown accustomed to MS Office throughout the years then 'retraining' becomes a problem.

#Openoffice versus microsoft office download

If you're looking at cost/'s not even close - OOo2 by far (even if you list its cost as equal to the cost of the bandwidth to download it).

I guess in some regards people's answers will change depending on their situation/perspective. Which do *you* feel is the better program, and why? I would really like to get all your opinions on this! :-k **P.S Does anyone know what the difference is between StarOffice and OpenOffice? They seem pretty much identical IMHO, although StarOffice costs £40?** :confused: However, for personal letter writing/essays/anything that doesnt require you to use the microsoft document formats, then StarOffice and OpenOffice are more than capable.įeature wise, I dont find a lot of difference between any of the 3 programs? Nothing that the average/intermediate user would notice anyway? The only thing that makes Office 2003 stand out is the industry standard document formats that it uses. xls files with them required me to fix a LOT of little errors, which is just not practical to do all the time.

Although StarOffice/OpenOffice 'officially' support these formats, the tests that I have performed on opening my own. xls are pretty much insustry standard document formats, and that if you have to send a file to someone, or share a file with others (a group of people passing around the same file after editing it for example), its pretty much a given that they want it sent to them in. My own personal opinion is that MS Office 2003 is the best. So I have the latest versions of each (to make it fair) I own Microsoft Office 2003, and have downloaded StarOffice 8 and OpenOffice 2.0.2 I would like to get everyone's opinions on this if I may.